Broken dependencies in Rawhide

Rahul Sundaram sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Sat May 17 10:19:45 UTC 2008


Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> I've just got a couple of e-mails stating that two of my packages have
> broken dependencies in the development tree:

> 
> This is just fuzz and I can ignore it, right?

Seems to be just a side effect of breakage from the latest glibc update 
in rawhide.  Should be safe to ignore IIUC.

Rahul




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list