package reviews: show only review reqs using a particluar language ?

[Till Maas]

On Tue May 27 2008, Andrew Farris wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:

> > Also it can be easily seen on a bug search results page. Maybe it could
> > be agreed on a special way to mention it in case it is not already
> > obvious, e.g. add the language in parenthesis after the package name,
> > e.g.
> >
> > Review Request: foobarmatic (ruby) - some foo for bar
>
> But language as a freeform random part of summary is not very clear either.

I did not suggest a freeform random part but a defined part of the subject, 
e.g. in parentheses.

> Review Request: foobarmatic c - some foo for C++ code documentation parsing
> Review Request: foobarmatic written in c++ - makes ruby colored slippers
> Review Request: foobarmatic perl - pythons on a plane

Review Request: foobarmatic (c) - some foo for C++ code documentation parsing
Review Request: foobarmatic (c++) - makes ruby colored slippers
Review Request: foobarmatic (perl) - pythons on a plane

Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080527/1709c91a/attachment.sig>