[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Comps/groups/tags-concepts [Was: FESCo Meeting Summary for 2008-10-29]




If comps ends up with a thousand programs under Games and Entertainment,
another thousand under Graphical Internet, etc., it's even more useless than
having nothing in comps at all. What would be the point? On the other hand,
having a thousand small comps groups is also no good.


So we're in the same boat if we start 'tagging' packages and/or if we just group them (which is essentially tagging from the other direction).


Let's take a step back. How do we group several thousand things such that they don't make the avg user lose his/her mind to look at them.

do we need groups of groups? A tree hierarchy the user can drill through? Font-sized tags like flickr/bloggers, etc?

I'm open to ideas, really. :)


-sv


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]