[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Comps/groups/tags-concepts [Was: FESCo Meeting Summary for 2008-10-29]



Given...

Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas mailhot laposte net) said: 
> - Hierarchical or tag-oriented classification ?
> - Relationship between classification and spins/repositories/tasks?
> - Single view of available repositories or multiple simplified
> (task-oriented? spin-oriented?) views?
> - Should we build those views from a single classification or can we
> afford to maintain different classification efforts per spin?
> - How are we going to merge classification from different repositories?
> - What is the classification workflow for Fedora? For
> third-party/private repositories without pkgdb access?
> - Do we need the comps mandatory/default/optional tristate or
> something else?
> - How do we scale from a three-package private repository to a
> Fedora-everything repository?
> - Do we need to manipulate packages? Package groups? Something else?
> - Do we need multilevel inheritance? (group A is in group B which is
> in group C, etc)
> - What is the right file format. XML, something else?
> - How can a classification file/set of files be audited for syntax
> errors (preferably in automated way)
> - i18n needs?
> - CLI tool needs?
> - GUI tools needs?

...

> There are lots of questions. Short term just putting everything into
> comps is the way to go but for mid-term to happen it should start
> soonish.

I'm not sure 'we need to answer 10-15 questions before we can even
do the classification' implies 'right now we need to change it so
everything is listed.'

Bill


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]