[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Comps/groups/tags-concepts [Was: FESCo Meeting Summary for 2008-10-29]

On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Jeremy Katz wrote:

It might make sense -- it depends on what the context is that they're
doing it in.  If I'm looking to play a certain type of game on my
installed box, yeah, I can maybe see that making sense.

But if instead I'm looking to install a system, I'm not as sure that it

Something like this:

And I do think that you want to have the same sort of
groupings/taggings/whatever for both cases... that or we switch to a "we
always install a large base set of stuff and then you can go in and
tweak to your heart's content".

Which is like livecd-based-install + gui-installer later, right?

 But that suggestion tends to make server-type people come after me with pitchforks and fire ;-)

My perspective on server-type installs has always been the same:
kickstart a minimal and %post the rest in via: yum -y install pkg1 pkg2 pkg3. But it might just be the years of success deploying like in that way which makes me think that ;)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]