[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Comps/groups/tags-concepts [Was: FESCo Meeting Summary for 2008-10-29]



Le mardi 04 novembre 2008 à 08:58 -0500, Bill Nottingham a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas mailhot laposte net) said: 
> > > That's solving a different problem the wrong way, which certainly
> > > seems better suited to a bit in the review request, or packagedb, etc.
> > 
> > The target is to automate review requests as much as possible not pile
> > up new manual checks. I don't ask this just for fun. I ask this because
> > I happen to do comps QA for my SIG every few months and manual checks
> > are not fun at all.
> 
> How is packagedb or bugzilla not automatable? We have programmatic interfaces
> to both.

How the hell is software going to guess some stuff is not in comps
because we intend it not to be in comps as opposed to stuff not being in
comps because someone forgot to put it there?

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]