Comps/groups/tags-concepts
Till Maas
opensource at till.name
Tue Nov 4 21:56:31 UTC 2008
On Tue November 4 2008, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> 2. this stuff can change during the (sub)package life, bugzilla only has
> the initial state (and not even all the packages, early packages are not
> in there)
I agree that bugzilla is not a good choice for this.
> 3. that pushes more logic infra-side, which is not nice for third
> parties (and we want third parties to be comfortable creating their own
> private additions to Fedora)
I cannot follow here, because third parties still can use the comps file that
any frontend will spit out.
> 4. that would mean packagers need to control the way their package
> appears in comps in two different places (unless you generate the whole
> file from this other place, which almost certainly rules out bugzilla
> and is contrary to 3. anyway), which means more packager hassle and
> something we want to avoid
I would enjoy a useful UI to edit groups, because I have to edit it around
once for each package I bring into Fedora, so a well designed UI can help a
lot here, that too manually search trough a huge xml file to find a
appropriate category. Also I do not see any reason why not both should be
possible, i.e. use packagedb as a frontend to edit comps and still store it
in some scm, where anyone interested can edit it manually.
Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081104/bc13ee07/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list