[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: starting Fedora Server SIG



Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas mailhot laposte net) said: 
> > and it is less right, X is brought in, and also qt qt-X11. Should
> > certainly be investigated.
> 
> That's probably because of LSB compliance. As has been discussed
> previously, someone needs to split the lsb package in server-side
> stuff and other stuff (yes that would mean a system that used only the
> first part would not be fully lsb compliant)

Alternatively... make it optional? Is LSB conformance required
for a minimal install?

Bill


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]