[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: starting Fedora Server SIG



Bill Nottingham píše v St 12. 11. 2008 v 12:08 -0500:
> Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas mailhot laposte net) said: 
> > > and it is less right, X is brought in, and also qt qt-X11. Should
> > > certainly be investigated.
> > 
> > That's probably because of LSB compliance. As has been discussed
> > previously, someone needs to split the lsb package in server-side
> > stuff and other stuff (yes that would mean a system that used only the
> > first part would not be fully lsb compliant)
> 
> Alternatively... make it optional? Is LSB conformance required
> for a minimal install?

IMHO LSB Core conformance should be required in minimal install


		Dan



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]