[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: starting Fedora Server SIG





On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Dan Horák wrote:


Bill Nottingham píše v St 12. 11. 2008 v 12:08 -0500:
Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas mailhot laposte net) said:
and it is less right, X is brought in, and also qt qt-X11. Should
certainly be investigated.

That's probably because of LSB compliance. As has been discussed
previously, someone needs to split the lsb package in server-side
stuff and other stuff (yes that would mean a system that used only the
first part would not be fully lsb compliant)

Alternatively... make it optional? Is LSB conformance required
for a minimal install?

IMHO LSB Core conformance should be required in minimal install


Why? LSB compliance should be an OPTION you can choose to have but it doesn't need to be there for a system work very well.

-sv

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]