[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: LSB; was: Re: starting Fedora Server SIG



On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 12:55 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
> I predict that when LSB 4.0 releases, there will be much 
> wailing and gnashing of teeth, because no-one from Fedora has 
> 'been at the table' arguing (and getting the consensus and 
> running code in place for) the 'Server SIG' need case.

Either that, or we'll just choose to ignore LSB, like, say, every Linux
ISV does.

Don't get me wrong, the idea of an LSB is sound, but somewhere between
implementation and adoption, things somehow went wrong, and we ended up
with ManBearPig.

~spot


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]