[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: starting Fedora Server SIG



Seth Vidal píše v Pá 14. 11. 2008 v 02:36 -0500:
> 
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Colin Walters wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Seth Vidal <skvidal fedoraproject org> wrote:
> >>
> >> It uses ANY memory. That's more than is reasonable considering that the
> >> former solution (ifconfig) uses none.
> >
> > NM and ifconfig are not comparable.  Now I think saying that NM
> > shouldn't use very much in the way of resources in the static routing
> > case is a reasonable request; certainly with the push for
> > virtualization and running lots of OS instances it makes sense.  But
> > it's just not reasonable to say "ANY" memory; that's not a reasonable
> > constraint to operate under.  We're trying to build an operating
> > system; that necessitates adding APIs and features, for example
> > network status change notification which is useful everywhere.
> >
> > It's perfectly fine though if someone's "create mediawiki appliance
> > image" tool strips out stuff; but we should be moving the core OS to
> > be more unified and featureful in general.
> 
> Featureful is exciting for desktops and for a smaller subset of servers 
> with special needs. For the vast majority of fairly boring servers it is 
> not exciting, it's just time consuming.
> 
> I've got no problem saying that people who use servers should have a 
> custom ks that strips out all the stuff they don't need. In fact, I 
> believe I've ALWAYS said that. I just don't want us to take steps that 
> make setting up that custom ks outrageously difficult. If we end up 
> tying the dependencies on these daemons very very low into the distro then 
> we end up making a lot of fairly boring server admins' lives difficult for no 
> good reason. All I'm saying is that the features that make NM useful 
> should not preclude someone from yum removing it w/o losing their whole 
> os.
> 
> Oh and my general opinion is that the features we should be working on 
> more than anything else are simplicity, security and stability.

It is really time to look back at the roots of Unix systems. It should
be a combination of small pieces with well defined interfaces doing well
their tasks. Only the time had changed those pieces from simple command
line utilities to more complex ones.


		Dan



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]