RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages
Till Maas
opensource at till.name
Thu Nov 20 14:49:20 UTC 2008
On Thu November 20 2008, Richard Hughes wrote:
> "A simple GNOME application that converts media files to Free formats"
>
> First, we don't need to say it's an application, not that it's GNOME
> specific. Surely something like this would be better:
If I understand you correctly, you say that the summary should not mention,
that it is GNOME specific, but in the bug report you write that this is a
good summary:
| GNOME Power Manager
Imho it is not bad to mention that an applications is GNOME / KDE / whatever
specific unless it is obvious from the package name. Also iirc the package
for the GNOME power manager is also named gnome-power-manager, so imho above
summary does not contain any additional useful information imho.
Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081120/8bcaf377/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list