[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

On Fri November 21 2008, Richard Hughes wrote:

> Good summaries:
> * Package management framework
> * XQuery and XPath 2.0 library for Xerces-C
> * Simple video DVD and CD authoring software
> * Feature rich media player
> * Media Player from the Mozilla Foundation
> * Gstreamer based media player
> * Customizable media player
> Bad summaries:
> * System daemon that is a DBUS abstraction layer for package management
> (too verbose)

I disagree that "Package management framework" would be a better summary 
instead of above, because imho it is a useful information that it is a daemon 
and uses DBUS.

> * XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C
> (repeating the program name)

In contradiction to above, the reworked summary for this still contains all 
the information. Here the alternative is a good improvement.

Also all the differen summaries for media players above do not really provide 
much information that allows to distinguish them, e.g. is the gstreamer based 
media player or the player from Mozilla not feature rich or customizable? I 
don't know, but the summary does not really help here.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]