[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: procedure for renaming a package



On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 12:56:16PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2008-10-06, 08:44 GMT, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > I may be wrong, maybe the TeX/LaTeX community in fedora is 
> > healthy, but this is not my impression.
> 
> Coming from the academia myself, I was quite surprised how 
> irrelevant TeX/LaTeX is outside of academia.

Agreed. That's very strange that this is not used more for publication.
Maybe people prefer docbook and xml in general.

> Anyway, is there any tex-fedora-friends list somewhere (if
> possible available at gmane.org)? I refuse to plow through
> fedora-reviews firehose.

As far as I can tell, no. No SIG, nothing. At the same time, I think
that waiting for texlive-2008 to know how many packages should be
packaged to have texlive coverage (400? 2000?), how we agregate stuff
would make sense.

Some reviews, but waiting for reviewer move:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582

I am willing to sponsor Vasile and Göran as soon as they have a package
in.

--
Pat


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]