Obsoletes question: codeina
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Oct 8 17:19:38 UTC 2008
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 20:16 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> I think the Obsoletes alone accomplishes auto-upgrading from codeina to
> pk-gstreamer-plugin. I hope that's what you meant as desirable in the
> above, I'm having a bit of a problem parsing it.
With an obsolete alone, 'yum update' would never see that it needs to
bring in pk-gstreamer-plugin. Codeina would be left alone. IMHO that's
not the scenario we want played out. We /want/ Codeina replaced by the
packagekit solution, and the only way to make that happen for people
already with codeina installed is to add the Provides.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081008/5b1e70e2/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list