[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Package review backlog.



On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 14:14 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 02:12 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 09.10.2008, 20:01 -0400 schrieb Josh Boyer:
> > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 01:41:32AM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > > >> Let's get the final two packages reviewed -- and that's another area
> > > >> where we could do with some improvement, because failing to approve
> > > >> packages really _is_ verging on the 'deletionism' you spoke of. But
> > > >> that's a separate discussion.
> > > >
> > > >Agreed, we can discuss this later. BTW: The word "deletionsm" did not
> > > >come from me, it was Josh who said that, but of course I agree with him.
> > > 
> > > I didn't say that.  Though I agree we need to be getting more packages
> > > approved.
> > 
> > I think this is something we all agree on. ;)
> 
> I propose that each FESCo member should try to work on at least one
> package review per week.
+1. Such a step is way over due.

Ralf



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]