Lennart Poettering <mzerqung <at> 0pointer.de> writes: > Hmm, am I the only one who finds the choice of the term "überpackager" > a bit questionnable? No, you aren't. I also consider the "uberpackager" name to be stupid due to the connotations that term has picked up, +1 for renaming it to "superpackager". Kevin Kofler