[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fedora-r-devel-list] Re: R-devel going away



On Thursday 23 October 2008 23:08:53 George N. White III wrote:
>
> There have always been conflicts between the CRAN package system and
> Fedora or other linux packaging Guidelines.   Users can install CRAN
> packages without root privileges, but then the search function won't know
> about the user's packages, and packages that rely on other library (gsl,
> hdf5, etc) still need -dev RPM's.   Linux distros should not be trying to
> enforce guidelines
> for mainstream packages with their own robust package management and
> archive networks.

Playing devil's advocate I should remark that first each language is building 
its own repository and packaging system in a sense we have lots of equivalents 
of (yum+rpm) for each language (perl,  php, python, R, tex, ...).

On the other hand for the system to be really useful it must use the least 
possible denominator (read the dumbest wins- pun intended ;-) ).

> Instead, they should look for ways to improve support
> for users who rely on those 3rd party systems.  For example:
>
> R-base: basic runtime without dev dependencies, for sites that provide
> binary CRAN packages (e.g., on a shared directory) so users don't need to
> do compiles.
>
> R-core: R-base + -dev dependencies for those who want to install source
> packages from CRAN (e.g., most individual R users)
>
> R-X-sup(plement): -dev dependencies needed to build package X (e.g.,
> R-hdf5-sup requires hdf5-dev for the hdf5 package from CRAN, gsl-dev
> for gsl, etc.).  These aren't strictly necessary, but would serve to
> link package versions on CRAN with the versions of the support libs in
> Fed,
> something that can take some effort (e.g., peeking in the sources) to
> determine.   For sites
> where users need to ask admins to install libraries, this simplifies
> the problem of telling the admin which libs to install.

I am not sure if this is right path or the right balance.

Another possible choice is to expand R2spec in scope and not only create rpm 
spec files but to discover the different dependencies and how they are solved 
inside.

There is no reason that we can not rebuild the whole CRAN (or almost all of 
it) automatically.

> In the long run, linux distros should look at devising ways to capture
> information from these
> 3rd party package managers to help resolve dependencies automatically.

As everything with free software the survival of the fittest means that this 
will only happen if there are people interested in spending resources to make 
this possible.
-- 
José Abílio




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]