Why eGroupWare is not in Fedora?

[Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)]

Axel Thimm пишет:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 12:17:13PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
>   
>> On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 20:14 +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
>> wrote:
>>     
>>> http://eGroupWare.org
>>> It is sponsored by RedHat. Download page present links to src.rpm (from 
>>> openSUSE buildservice 
>>> <http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/eGroupWare/> :) ) so 
>>> I think it is not hard porting for Fedora.
>>> Any legal issues? On first look it is GPLv2 and GPLv3. So, why it is not 
>>> here (I also check reviews in progress)? Or it just wait maintainer and 
>>> I can try make review request?
>>>
>>>       
>> I think it just needs a maintainer/packager.
>>
>> Feel free to apply for it.
>>     
>
> egroupware looks really nice. As did opengroupware before I attempted
> packaging it. :/
>
> I'd really like to push some more groupware bits into Fedora and see
> which one is the fittest. egroupware does look a bit easier to
> package, and if there is interest from more than one person we already
> have a packager and a reviewer!
>
> Pavel, do you want to attack this and have me review it?
>   
I can try. But now for me more interesting egroupware than packaging it :)
So, I have now 2 packages in progress, and if meanwhile someone do not 
start working on it I can try "making this a "good" rpm" ( (C) Jos Vos )
> IIRC correctly there was some attempt in forming a Fedora groupware
> SIG. What happened to it?
>