Non responsive maintainer question

[Tom "spot" Callaway]

On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 13:52 +0100, Simon Andrews wrote:
> A bug I reported back in February (#432767) has been sitting for some 
> time with a couple of reported fixes, but no response from the maintainer.
> 
> I've looked at the non-responsive maintainer policy, but this seems to 
> only apply in the case where you want to take over the package yourself 
> - which I don't have the skills to do.
> 
> Is there a procedure for flagging up that a package maintainer seems to 
> have gone AWOL whilst asking for anyone suitably qualified to take it over?

While we're doing that, I've kicked the package up to current to resolve
the technical issue.

~scruffy, the janitor