[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: No dynamic groups in PackageKit



On 23.09.2008 20:15, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 23.09.2008 19:58, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 19:52 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Just wondering and making sure I get this right: What exactly do you mean by "changed" in the latter sentence?

(1) just use the same ids and description and list only the packages from RPM Fusion in the rpmfusion comps.xml files

(2) import the whole comps.xml stuff from Fedora, keep it in sync and add the RPM Fusion packages

I suppose you meant (1)?
I think I misspoke on the translation side, that likely doesn't matter.
James gave a better description of what happened.

I'd recommend using 1 if you want your packages to show up along side
other Fedora packages in the same groups.

I'll give it a try in RPM Fusions devel branch; we can easily switch it back later if needed.

Done, but only for the "free" repo for now; new comps can be found for review in CVS for RPM Fusion:
http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/comps/comps-f10.xml.in?root=free&view=markup

File is on the way to the repo and should be available at
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/<arch>/os/comps.xml
in a few minutes.

James, Jesse, does that look like it should look like?

Some questions:

- Should I better remove the fields "<_name>", "<_description>" "<default>" and "<uservisible>" to avoid mixing up what comes from Fedora's comps.xml?

- I don't define any category's; is that okay?

CU
knurd


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]