Looking for reviews swaps

[Ralf Corsepius]

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> 
>> Spot is the Red Hat Legal spokesperson. He is the one having the final
>> say around here and is the person I am considering to be responsible for
>> processing legal requests.
>>
>>> Did you even bother to read the link?
>> Yes, ... and?
>>
>> Answers from "legal" are a matter of "how to ask questions" - IMO, they
>> all failed.
> 
> Considering that you actually think binaries not available freely is the
> same as non-free, I will take FSF and Red Hat Legal's opinion over
> yours. Also if you consider that game content as non-free you might want
> to look closely at so much of the other content licenses such as Vera or
> OFL.  Atleast, then you would have a consistent stand point.
Where am I inconsistent?

I say Fedora is inconsiseent: These sound files, images, etc. are not 
free and qualify Fedora as "non-free". Fedora's separation between 
"data" and "programs" is absurd.