Independent Fedora bug tracker

[Arthur Pemberton]

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl at redhat.com> wrote:
> King InuYasha <ngompa13 at gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> I think this squares with my theory up-thread that it's mostly a network
>>>> issue and not the database per se.  It would be interesting to compare
>>>> the ping times the two of you see to bugzilla.redhat.com.
>
>> [ two responses, no data ]
>
> I take it nobody wants to sully their complaining with actual facts
> that might help narrow down the problem.
>
>                        regards, tom lane


>From my desktop:

$ ping -c 50 -i 5 -q -s 512 bugzilla.redhat.com
PING bugzilla.redhat.com (209.132.176.231) 512(540) bytes of data.

--- bugzilla.redhat.com ping statistics ---
50 packets transmitted, 50 received, 0% packet loss, time 245167ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 114.606/118.980/135.277/3.966 ms

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )