Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:34:26 -0700
Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:

...snip...

> Sure, and I was always happy to write in GNOME and KDE versions as
> 'Features' when writing release blurbs for Mandriva. But that's just
> pure PR. PR is not all our feature process does - it comes with all
> this bureaucracy, intended for dealing with experimental stuff which
> may turn out to have been a bad idea, attached to it, it's _not_ a
> pure PR exercise. Which leads to the absurdity we have here, the
> suggestion that the GNOME 2.28 'feature' should be 'dropped' for
> Fedora 12 (does anyone really think we're going to ship it with GNOME
> 2.26?)

It wasn't a suggestion of that, it was our feature wrangler saying:
hey, check these features because they are not showing 100%. 

Please see: 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy

Do we need to change some policy there?

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090806/e369b953/attachment.sig>