KDE vs. GNOME on F10
Bill McGonigle
bill at bfccomputing.com
Fri Aug 7 15:24:03 UTC 2009
On 08/06/2009 10:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> so if a package does get an 'adventurous' update
> then hits a security bug, there's no way to have a separate update
> without the adventurous change but with the security bug fixed
so, two separate issues: one is making the updates, the other is solving
for them. I only meant that with tags you could potentially solve for
available updates within a single repo.
> I'm not sure you could _make_ a 'Solid' spin unless there was a Solid
> update path to work off.
Right, to do that we'd need a SIG interested in making sure there was
one. Some package developers/maintainers would probably join, others
wouldn't be interested. It's probably not necessary to have all of
Fedora in such a spin, but where there are users there tends to be interest.
-Bill
--
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668
http://www.bfccomputing.com/ Cell: 603.252.2606
Twitter, etc.: bill_mcgonigle Page: 603.442.1833
Email, IM, VOIP: bill at bfccomputing.com
Blog: http://blog.bfccomputing.com/
VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list