Confusion with openal-soft

Christoph Wickert christoph.wickert at googlemail.com
Mon Aug 17 08:53:00 UTC 2009


Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 10:32 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> On 08/17/2009 04:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 00:02 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> >> On 08/16/2009 11:07 PM, LinuxDonald wrote:
> >>> Only the devel packages conflicts.
> >>
> >> Just in case, it is not clear. You have broken every package that
> >> depends on openal in Fedora 11 and Fedora 10 and there is no way for the
> >> package maintainers to fix it.
> > 
> > Why is there no way to fix it???
> 
> See my first mail on this thread.

I did , but it doesn't explain why maintainers shouldn't be able to fix
it.

> >> Are you going to cancel the openal-soft to push to these branches?
> > 
> > AFAIC it's delayed until dependencies are rebuilt.
> 
> It got fixed by not obsoleting openal in the stable branches.

So where is the problem then? I don't understand the bother.

> Rahul

Regards,
Christoph




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list