[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Build Failure regarding Boost



On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Tim Niemueller <tim niemueller de> wrote:
On 01.12.2009 19:15, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> Broadly speaking (beyond just Fedora), there's enough variability in the
> potential names of Boost libraries that a package's configuration needs
> the ability to specify a Boost library suffix.  It sounds like your
> package's configuration is trying to be clever and divine the required
> suffix--and it's failing and falling back to no suffix.
>
> If your package's configuration won't let you specify a suffix, the most
> expedient thing to do may be just to hack it on.  But an upstream-worthy
> patch would add a means to specify an arbitrary suffix.  Also, -mt is a
> saner default than no suffix at all.

The suffix is determined in /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindBoost.cmake
which is part of cmake, so there is nothing I can do about this in the
Player package. Could this be a problem with new cmake or boost versions?

       Tim

--
   Tim Niemueller <tim niemueller de>      www.niemueller.de
=================================================================
 Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein)

--


Perhaps CMake needs to be updated to 2.8.0 final? I think there was a FindBoost.cmake update in 2.8.0...

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]