[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Blocking radeonhd (was Re: Fedora 12 Graphics Issues: Cancel F13 and concentrate on fixing F12 ?)



Dne 1.12.2009 21:43, Bill Nottingham napsal(a):
If the e1000 driver is broken in the kernel for some people, we don't support
shipping an alternate driver. If a new version of the intel graphics driver
is broken for some people, we don't support shipping a pre-KMS version
of the driver.

Why would we do differently here?

Because if e1000 is broken, we can be sure with reasonably high level of certainity, it will be fixed without undue delay. For Xorg drivers (especially with regards to 3D support) we have hope that it will be slightly better in the next Fedora release, but complete coverage is still just a dream.

Moreover, I don't know what's your problem with radeonhd driver in Fedora. Hanz does IMHO excellent job on maintaining it and it doesn't drag much additional resources on anybody (except on me, perhaps, because I triage bugs for him as well, which is the reason that this time I even a little know what I am talking about ;)). And of course comparing -radeonhd bugs (http://is.gd/59Hc0) with -ati bugs (http://is.gd/59Hp0) is unfair, because there are many more users of -ati driver, but at least it shows that radeonhd is really not burning issue.

What's the problem?

Matěj

--
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mcepl<at>ceplovi.cz
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB  25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC

Our lives are spectacles of powerlessness.
    -- Richard Rohr


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]