[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: x86-64 on i386 (was Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?)



On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Adam Williamson wrote:

On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 12:33 +0000, Paul Jakma wrote:

You're missing the point.

If I put you in front of 2 identical machines, one running 32bit and
one 64bit software, would you be able to tell which one was which,
from the interactive performance of common applications? I'd be
willing to bet that for the vast majority of applications you
wouldn't be.

That's a silly argument, because it simply relies on the fact that most
uses of computers aren't CPU-bound at all. In the same way I could
probably steal half the RAM from your system and clock the CPU down 50%
(the BOFH's favourite revenue-generating technique!) and from 'the
interactive performance of common applications' you wouldn't be able to
tell the difference. I don't think that _means_ very much, though.

It's quite meaningful, e.g. for power conservation. As you no doubt are aware of, modern system regularly clock down the CPU.

regards,
--
Paul Jakma	paul jakma org	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
It occurred to me lately that nothing has occurred to me lately.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]