[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Vala programs and compiling from source

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson gmail com> wrote:
> Hi,
>> I recently submitting Deja-dup, a backup program written in Vala for
>> review at
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761
>> Vala is described in more detail at http://live.gnome.org/Vala. Deja-dup
>> like many Vala programs include both the Vala source code and the C
>> "source code" to avoid a build time requirement of Vala and also because
>> Vala is still in a rapidly evolving stage.  Do I need to build from the
>> original Vala source code or can I consider the machine generated C as
>> "source"?
> For rygel to date I've used the C as "source" unless I've needed to
> patch a bug or build issue with it when you then need to regenerate
> it.
> Regards,
> Peter
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

I'd probably compile the Vala source since that's what the upstream
project is written in and just have the build require Vala. Just my
opinion though. C is definitely the safe choice, but I think the more
Vala is used and tested the better it will get.


()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]