[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: dist-git proof of concept phase 2 ready for testing



On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 19:28 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> 
> The whole problem is that such branches do not exist at all in the new git 
> setup!
> 
> > If you get eaten by raptors, you can't expect another maintainer to come
> > in after you and have to dig around for a private branch to update a
> > build.
> 
> That's why we need non-private branches (more than one per release), as 
> allowed by our current CVS setup.
> 

Perhaps we have a terminology clash.

The dist-git proof of concept allows branches to be created by
maintainers, and pushed to the central repo, so long as the branch name
starts with "private-".  These repos can be written to by anybody with
file system write access, that is anybody in the 'packager' group.

At this time, I am not planning to allow official tagged builds to come
from these branches, instead they can only come from origin/master or
origin/F-??

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]