Why do we disable esd in libgnome?

[King InuYasha]

But when you break something as major as libgnome, steps should be taken to
ease the transition. Perhaps the function could be forwarded? I'm not really
much of a programmer, but I recognize that you can't just break
functionality in core libraries like that and expect everyone to fix their
apps up "just like that." Fowarding the function (for compatibility
purposes) while deprecating it would probably be more ideal. In any case,
that's just my two cents...

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Bastien Nocera <bnocera at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 22:31 -0500, Jens Petersen wrote:
> > ----- "平天韩" <hanpingtian at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Right. How about enable esd in libgnome please?
> >
> > I suggest you file a bug in bugzilla if there isn't one already and see
> what happens.
>
> Will probably be closed as WONTFIX. The API docs made it clear that the
> libgnome sound support was a build-time option.
>
> The application should be fixed to use more modern API.
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090202/49ccc2c7/attachment.htm>