[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide-20090126 with gcc-4.4.0-0.9



Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!

In the past few days I've done a mass rebuild of rawhide-20090126
in mock with gcc-4.4.0-0.9 (and corresponding libtool).
6228 packages were successfully built, for the rest I've tried
to rebuild them also with gcc-4.3.2-7 (though I ran out of time,
so a couple of packages weren't attempted with 4.3).

If we fix a package, are we supposed to perform a normal (i.e. not scratch) build into dist-f11-gcc44 (and/or dist-f11)? Or should we just tag and let it be (for a new mass rebuild)?

Regards,
Milos Jakubicek


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]