Heads up: Noarch Subpackages

Florian Festi ffesti at redhat.com
Thu Feb 12 12:19:15 UTC 2009


Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> What we needed for OCaml was a noarch main package and arch-specific
> subpackages.  Is this now possible?

Out of curiosity: What is speaking against just creating one or several 
-common noarch sub packages?

Florian




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list