[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Summary of the 2008-10-21 Packaging Committee meeting



Debarshi Ray wrote, at 01/04/2009 06:38 PM +9:00:
Issues pending FESCo ratification:

[...]

* Desktop File guideline modification
** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor
** This removes language which many interpreted as requiring most
  desktop files to be installed with --vendor=fedora.

What is the current status of this? Should new packages use
--vendor=fedora or not?

Cheers,
Debarshi


From:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg02273.html

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Guideline Proposals ===
* FESCo had no objections to the guideline proposals approved by the
FPC. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes/20081021

Regards,
Mamoru


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]