[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: proposal for fedora11 feature ReviewOMatic



2009/1/6 Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs math uh edu>:
>>>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas mailhot laposte net> writes:
[..]
>
> Surely you don't want to be automatically mailbombed with the rpmlint
> output from all of your packages.  That would only lead to bogus
> changes just to shut up equally bogus complaints, or some random
> syntax in comments within a specfile indicating what rpmlint
> complaints are expected.  Does anyone actually want that?
>


Most of I guess wants rpmlint output(my assumption). What they decide
based on that output is upto them.

It is not in plans to replace reviewer or even rpmlint or change the
workflow. Decision will always be with reviewer. And reviewer will
decide what is bogus or not.

-- 
rakesh


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]