proposal for fedora11 feature ReviewOMatic

Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pandit at gmail.com
Tue Jan 6 15:32:31 UTC 2009


2009/1/6 Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs at math.uh.edu>:
>>>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> writes:
[..]
>
> Surely you don't want to be automatically mailbombed with the rpmlint
> output from all of your packages.  That would only lead to bogus
> changes just to shut up equally bogus complaints, or some random
> syntax in comments within a specfile indicating what rpmlint
> complaints are expected.  Does anyone actually want that?
>


Most of I guess wants rpmlint output(my assumption). What they decide
based on that output is upto them.

It is not in plans to replace reviewer or even rpmlint or change the
workflow. Decision will always be with reviewer. And reviewer will
decide what is bogus or not.

-- 
rakesh




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list