[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Non-responsive maintainer process for Damien Durand



2009/1/13 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt gmail com>:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:13:17 +0530, Rakesh wrote:
>
[..]
>
> The thing that bugs me is that you try to blame other people in
> justification of your own mistakes. In the original post, and also in the
> private messages. Okay, Matt forgot to commit the source, most likely
> while committing fixes for other build failures. So what? If the package
> had a maintainer, he would notice the build failure and fix this small
> mistake. The pkg is orphaned, however.
>

Well I have already agreed of using old working copy and not checking
diffs painstakingly. Between your commit in devel also ignored source
import and build. You had updated to new version and didn't bothered
to update the source and support your statement with a false argument
that "if it had a maintainer". Package should not be left it that
state.

> Current status of gdmap in cvs now is that on three branches, %version and
> %release values in the spec have been decreased and are lower than latest
> tag. Whoever will touch the pkg next will probably run into this trap and
> then need to examine the tags. And the desktop file patch is missing, too.
>

I am getting back the dead file and doing the fix. Give me some breath.

-- 
rakesh


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]