[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: pam_console



Jack Tanner wrote:
> It's still visible to this user. Even though sound device permissions are
> set through HAL *by default*, pam_console is still a perfectly serviceable
> alternative. Now, you're saying you want to take this alternative away.
> That places the onus on you to make this transition bearable. (I'm not
> arguing against hal/ck on technical merits, just their practical
> ease-of-use today.)

The point is that users shouldn't be murking with pam_console or HAL
permissions at all. They shouldn't have to. It's the packagers' job to make
the permissions be correct out of the box.

        Kevin Kofler


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]