[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Draft: simple update description guidelines

On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 23:48 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

>  * All Updates must refer to a upstream changelog or equivalent if one 
> exists. Otherwise a brief description (a couple of sentence at most) 
> justifying the need for an update must be provided by the maintainers 
> pushing the update.
> * If there are downstream bugs being fixed or intended to be fixed with 
> an update, it must be referred within the update. Maintainers can choose 
> to let bodhi auto close bugs or close it manually as well.
> * For security update, add CVE information, if one exists.
> * It is highly recommended that package maaintainers highlight major new 
> features, critical bug fixes or anything else that has a potential high 
> impact on consumers of your update.

I'd suggest the tone should be less prescriptive - i.e. not so much "you
must do foo" - and also give some rationale.

e.g. "when preparing your update, consider what the user will see and
how they will decide whether they should apply the update".


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]