[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Draft: simple update description guidelines



On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 02:49:38AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Denis Leroy wrote:
>> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> * All Updates must refer to a upstream changelog or equivalent if one 
>>> exists. Otherwise a brief description (a couple of sentence at most)  
>>> justifying the need for an update must be provided by the maintainers 
>>> pushing the update.
>>
>> -1
>>
>> This is borderline insane.
>
> There is no voting. That is left to FESCo and you are not being specific.

There is always voting.  FESCo welcomes commentary and discussion, as we
are elected representatives of the packager and developer communities.
Please do not dissuade people from expressing their opinion.

I will note that specifics are certainly more helpful that simple +/-1
emails.

josh


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]