[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Draft: simple update description guidelines

>> > so what's the point? Yum's changelog plugin is
>> > much more useful than this proposal will ever be.
>> Actually, that's my fallback when no infos are provided in PK.
>> But that doesn't take away the fact that having infos in PK would be
>> really nice :)
> Sure, file a bug. I didn't know we could get the ChangeLog comments from
> yum. There's already support for it in the PK API.

No, I was talking about the infos about the update, the ones the
discussion is about, not the rpm changelog !

As said previously, it doesn't necessarily make sense (depending on
who is speaking) to have the rpm changelog displayed as the
information update in PK.


Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~Benjamin Franklin

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]