[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Draft: simple update description guidelines



On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:23:42 +0100, Dominik wrote:

> On Tuesday, 27 January 2009 at 19:18, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> [...]
> > ---
> > 
> > * All Updates must refer to a upstream changelog or equivalent if one 
> > exists. Otherwise a brief description (a couple of sentence at most) 
> > justifying the need for an update must be provided by the maintainers 
> > pushing the update.
> > 
> > * If there are downstream bugs being fixed or intended to be fixed with 
> > an update, it must be referred within the update. Maintainers can choose 
> > to let bodhi auto close bugs or close it manually as well.
> 
> This is redundant. bodhi has a field for bug numbers and it's pretty
> self-explanatory.

Bodhi itself, however, floods those bugzilla tickets with
comments. The most confusing comment is the one that notifies about
"submitted" (= pending) updates, which are only available within
koji. If we talk about "real users", this is the first comment
that ought to be killed, since users are confused a lot by 
updates, which are not available.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]