[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: what requires fedora-release-notes

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:03:06AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 19:02 +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
> >  
> > Jesse, is there any important data in this package which needs to be 
> > shipped in Fedora at any cost?
> > I can imagine some legal or licensing information about Fedora.
> I don't believe so.

The arguable value of the "About Fedora" item -- which as some Desktop
team members have noted, probably needs to be revamped -- is certainly
not enough to keep it.  It would be prudent and probably good manners
to alert the Docs team about contemplating dropping this, too.

Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

Attachment: pgpXhD5XkbtzP.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]