[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: what requires fedora-release-notes

On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 13:50 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:03:06AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 19:02 +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
> > >  
> > > Jesse, is there any important data in this package which needs to be 
> > > shipped in Fedora at any cost?
> > > I can imagine some legal or licensing information about Fedora.
> > 
> > I don't believe so.
> The arguable value of the "About Fedora" item -- which as some Desktop
> team members have noted, probably needs to be revamped -- is certainly
> not enough to keep it.  It would be prudent and probably good manners
> to alert the Docs team about contemplating dropping this, too.

Well, we would make it a default install item via groupings, but perhaps
not /forced/ install, so that one could remove it/opt out of installing
it should they wish.

Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]