[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Draft: simple update description guidelines



On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:15 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Bodhi itself, however, floods those bugzilla tickets with
> > comments. The most confusing comment is the one that notifies about
> > "submitted" (= pending) updates, which are only available within
> > koji. If we talk about "real users", this is the first comment
> > that ought to be killed, since users are confused a lot by
> > updates, which are not available.
> 
> I disagree. It claims nowhere that those updates have been pushed, and for
> me it is good to know that a fix has been queued. Maybe the wording could
> be changed to be clearer to the new users? I.e. instead of just:
> foo-1.2.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
> it could say something on the lines of:
> foo-1.2.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10 and will be
> available for testing shortly. A followup will be posted once the update is
> available on the mirrors. Note that it may take up to a few days for
> updates to become available.
> 
>         Kevin Kofler

That seems reasonable, can you file a bodhi ticket with that?  Luke
could probably get that in the next bodhi refresh.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]