[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Draft: simple update description guidelines



On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> The general consensus seem to push for more of a best practises  
> document. So I am going with
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Markmc/Draft_package_update_guidelines

Once more: Why do we not explicitly ask the Bodhi submitter for details
using much more fields? Having more possibilities to fill data in makes it
easier to new packagers - they're remembered. Why do you want to solve a
thing with a Guideline rather enhancing Bodhi and making that software just
packager friendly?


Greetings,
  Robert


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]