[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Draft: simple update description guidelines

On 29.01.2009 11:11, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:14:48 +0000, Mark wrote:
Okay, here's an attempt:
Much better, an effort much appreciated, although this is way beyond
the subject of this thread. ;)

That's what I thought as well. The fist draft from Rahul was more a "what information to add to bodhi updates request"; this one also touches "Maintaining Stability".

And it does so without answering the question properly. So it will continue as now: Some maintainers will use a debian-like style, others more a rolling-release style. That's a bit confusing from a users point of view.

Such a document goes into the right
direction, since it tries to explain Fedora's fundamental update
strategy and may come as a surprise to some packagers. It will be very
interesting to hear what FESCo members think about the contents.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]