[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009

On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 11:58 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.01.2009, 20:25 -0500 schrieb Brian Pepple:
> > This is all a moot point now though, since a couple of weeks ago FESCo
> > approved a proposal to reset the initial seeding of the provenpackager
> > group with Packaging Sponsors, and Jesse has made a proposal(1) on
> > guidelines for approving someone to the provenpackager group.
> > 
> >      1. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg01573.html
> > 
> IMO this is not a moot point at all, because even after the group was
> reset, there are people in there that I don't want to see there.
> For example I just found out that one of the people I sponsor is proven
> packager. Of course I do trust him, otherwise I would not have sponsored
> him, but I doubt that 2 packages (!) and 3 months of experience are
> enough for a proven packager.

Umm, it is moot, since the *reset* hasn't actually occurred yet.  If the
person your referring to, isn't a Package sponsor he will not be a
provenpackager in the reseed.

Brian Pepple <bpepple fedoraproject org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]