[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- From: Robert Scheck <robert fedoraproject org>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:34:26 +0100
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> IMHO, all packages should have open ACLs, with no exceptions (yes, even the
> kernel!), and I don't think we should make it as hard to get into
> provenpackager as some people are suggesting (10 to 15 sponsors needed,
> WTF?).
That every new packager having a single package can touch the kernel, glibc
and gcc? Nice idea, yes. That would bring up the word "playground" again, I
used today already.
Greetings,
Robert
- References:
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
- Re: Package Review Stats for the week ending January 18th, 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]